Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 435 F.2d 299 - Joseph Parisi v. Major General Phillip B. Davidson

Joseph Parisi v. Major General Phillip B. Davidson’s Empirical Analysis

435 F.2d 299 · 1970

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
April 1972
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Appellate journey

Relationships

Relies on Orloff v. Willoughby · United States v. Seeger · Burns v. Wilson · Gusik v. Schilder · Noyd v. Bond

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Were every soldier dissatisfied with some phase of national policy or military effort allowed to exercise similar discretion, necessary military discipline would collapse. Had Parisi bid-ed his time, it appears, on the record before us now, that he likely would have obtained the relief he sought from the District Court. If the fruits of his impatience are bitter, he has only himself to blame for their production. “A serviceman facing court-martial should not be permitted habeas relief in a federal court during the pendency of his military trial and appeals therefrom, except, perhaps, when it might appear that no military tribunal to which he has recourse is capable of granting an appropriate remedy.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.