Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

435 F.2d 554

Docket No. 25746.

Barry Don Simmons, and v. Walter E. Craven, Warden, Folsom State Prison, And

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

January 4, 1971.

Rehearing Denied February 2, 1971.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1971-01-04

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1971

2 counsel of record

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Bruton v. United States · Commodore William Moss v. Walter E. Craven, Warden

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1971-01-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; George B. Harris, Judge.

Barry Don Simmons, in pro. per.

Thomas C. Lynch, Cal. Atty. Gen., Derald E. Granberg, Eric Collins, Deputy Attys. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before CHAMBERS, HAMLEY and MERRILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

The decision of the district court denying habeas corpus relief is affirmed.

¶2

Here a pre-Boykin (Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274) guilty plea is attacked.

¶3

There is no allegation that he did not understand the consequences of his plea. And, he had competent trial counsel.

¶4

The contention that his plea was coerced because there was a threat to use his wife as a witness is made. Assuming this would violate a privilege either he or his wife could claim, the answer is he had competent counsel, a state rule of evidence is involved, and we have held in Moss v. Craven, 9 Cir., 427 F.2d 139, that Boykin is not retroactive.

/435/f2d/554 · .json · Public domain