United States v. Queen’s Empirical Analysis
435 F.2d 66 · 1970
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably Pillai v. Civil Aeronautics Board (1973), Rinehart v. State (1975)
22 federal appellate · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Wade · Townsend v. Burke · Gregg v. United States · Luck v. United States · Mason v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“refused disclosure of the presentence report pursuant to [its] general policy of non-disclosure, and without any reference to the need for disclosure or confidentiality in the circumstances of this particular case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the discretion called for by Rule 32 is the exercise of discretion in individual cases, not the discretion of the trial judge to adopt a uniform policy of non-disclosure in all cases irrespective of circumstances.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.