Fogle v. Pierson’s Empirical Analysis
435 F.3d 1252 · 2006
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 17 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 232 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2025 · most notably Gee v. Pacheco (2010), Trujillo v. Williams (2006)
13 federal appellate · 17 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Wolff v. McDonnell · Neitzke v. Williams · Turner v. Safley · Sandin v. Conner · Lewis Director Arizona Department of Corrections v. Casey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 232 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that some form of regular outdoor exercise is extremely important to the psychological and physical well being of inmates, and some courts have held a denial of fresh air and exercise to be cruel and unusual punishment under certain circumstances.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[plrison officials may not retaliate against or harass an inmate because of the inmate's exercise of his constitutional rights”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“if in fact DOC officials retaliated against [plaintiff] based on his filing administrative grievances, they may be liable for a violation of his constitutional rights.” Id. 13 . Plaintiff asserts the same supervisory inaction claim against defendant Nelson. As set forth above, however, Nelson did not assume the position of Director of the DOC's Records Office until after plaintiffs release from jail, and plaintiff’s claim against her in her individual capacity must therefore be dismissed. 14 . Plaintiff identifies in particular an October 1999 report, which, according to plaintiff,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.