Cano v. Baker’s Empirical Analysis
435 F.3d 1337 · 2006
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably Aldana v. Del Monte Fresh Produce N.A. (2014), MKB Management Corp. v. Stenehjem (2015)
5 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Roe v. Wade · Agostini v. Felton Chancellor Board of Education of the City of New York · Doe v. Bolton · Seven Elves, Inc. v. Eskenazi · Griffin v. Swim-Tech Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must demonstrate that the circumstances are sufficiently extraordinary to warrant relief. Even then, whether to grant the requested relief is ... a matter for the district court’s sound discretion. The appellant’s burden on appeal is heavy. [I]t is not enough that a grant of the [Rule 60(b) motion] might have been permissible or warranted; rather, the decision to deny the motion ... must have been sufficiently unwarranted as to amount to an abuse of discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.