Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 435 F.3d 268 - Springer v. Henry

Springer v. Henry’s Empirical Analysis

435 F.3d 268 · 2006

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
2
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 8 district · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. · Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205 Will County Illinois · Duncan v. Walker · SAUCIER v. KATZ Et Al. · Hunter v. Bryant

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A new trial should be granted only where the great weight of the evidence cuts against the verdict and where a miscarriage of justice would result if the verdict were to stand.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “disregard all evidence favorable to the moving party that the jury is not required to believe.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a substantial or motivating factor,” not”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.