Springer v. Henry’s Empirical Analysis
435 F.3d 268 · 2006
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 8 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. · Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205 Will County Illinois · Duncan v. Walker · SAUCIER v. KATZ Et Al. · Hunter v. Bryant
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A new trial should be granted only where the great weight of the evidence cuts against the verdict and where a miscarriage of justice would result if the verdict were to stand.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“disregard all evidence favorable to the moving party that the jury is not required to believe.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a substantial or motivating factor,” not”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.