United States v. Danford’s Empirical Analysis
435 F.3d 682 · 2005
Citation profile
31 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently June 2021 · most notably United States v. Benabe (2011), United States v. Tolliver (2006)
31 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Booker · Crawford v. Washington · Ohio v. Roberts · Richardson v. Marsh · United States v. Paladino
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Restitution is determined by the judge using the lower preponderance of the evidence standard.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.