United States v. Carrillo’s Empirical Analysis
435 F.3d 767 · 2006
Citation profile
42 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably United States v. Leahy (2006), United States v. Griffin (2008)
42 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Zafiro v. United States · United States v. Paladino · United States v. Townsend · De Luna v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“wide discretion in determining when the prejudice of joinder outweighs the benefits of a single trial.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“prevent the jury from making a reliable judgment about guilt or innocence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““Knowledge may be proved by the defendants’ conduct and by all the facts and circumstances surrounding the case. You may infer knowledge from a combination of suspicion and indifference to the truth. If you find that a person had a strong suspicion that things were not what they seemed or that someone had withheld some important facts yet shut his eyes for fear of what he would learn, you may conclude that he acted knowingly as I have used that word. You may not conclude that the defendant had knowledge if he was merely negligent in not discovering the truth.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.