Doe v. Rumsfeld’s Empirical Analysis
435 F.3d 980 · 2006
Citation profile
7 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Mistretta v. United States · Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp. · Louisiana Public Service Commission v. Federal Communications Commission · United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp. · John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co Harris Trust and Savings Bank Sperry Master Retirement Trust No
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Laws and regulations that govern military personnel may change without notice to me. Such changes may affect my status, pay, allowances, benefits, and responsibilities as a member of the Armed Forces REGARDLESS of the provisions of this enlistment/reenlistment document.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.