Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 435 FSUPP 200 - Owens v. Mathews

Owens v. Mathews’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
January 1988
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 30 U.S.C. § 921 · 30 U.S.C. § 923 · 30 U.S.C. § 924 · 30 U.S.C. § 925 · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Eisenstadt v. Baker · Moon v. Celebrezze · Futernick v. Richardson · Carqueville v. Flemming

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(f) The term “total disability” has the meaning given it by regulations of the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, except that such regulations shall provide that a miner shall be considered totally disabled when pneumoconiosis prevents him from engaging in gainful employment requiring the skills and abilities comparable to those of any employment' in a mine or mines in which he previously engaged with some regularity and over a substantial period of time. Such regulations shall not provide more restrictive criteria than those applicable under section 423(d) of Title 42.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.