Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 435 MD 443 - Holt v. State

Holt v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
1
states following
December 2022
most recently cited

43 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Wong Sun v. United States · Brown v. Illinois · Cartnail v. State · United States v. Sprinkle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a new crime committed by a defendant after an illegal search or seizure is a sufficient intervening circumstance that can attenuate the taint of an illegal search or seizure.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “decision of whether a subsequent crime constitutes an intervening circumstance must be determined on a case-by-case basis[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “would be to ignore the very purpose underlying the exclusionary rule”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.