Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 435 NE2D 1019 - R. S. v. State

R. S. v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2010
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Carlton v. Board of Zoning Appeals

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “compl[y] with the spirit of Ind.Code § 31-6-9-2(b) [since repealed and recodified at Indiana Code section 31-31-3-6(2)]. Merely finding that the respondent did or did not commit certain acts is not an adequate factual basis upon which the juvenile judge may order a judgment of delinquency ..., or adequate for meaningful review by this court. We hold that the failure of the referee to make an adequate written record of findings and recommendations pursuant to [the statute] is error, and, therefore, reverse and remand this case with instructions to the referee to make such a written record of her findings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “with the spirit of Ind.Code § 31-6-9-2(b) [since repealed and reco-dified at Indiana Code section 31-31-3- ]. Merely finding that the respondent did, or did not commut certain acts is not an adequate factual basis upon which the juvenile judge may order a judgment of delinquency ..., or adequate for meaningful review by this court. We hold that the failure of the referee to make an adequate written record of findings and recommendations pursuant to [the statute] is error, and, therefore, reverse and remand this case with instructions to the referee to make such a written record of her findings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “shall submit findings and recommendations in writing to the juvenile court, which shall enter such order as it considers proper....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.