Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 435 N.E.2d 235 - Barnes v. State

Barnes v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
October 2010
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently October 2010

20 state decisions

1101982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 5003

Relies on Santobello v. New York · Hollars v. State · Page v. State · Bell v. State · Gilmore v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is not improper to inquire of prospective jurors if their own personal feelings could be influenced by such facts being presented so that the parties might know that an impartial and unprejudiced jury is trying their cause. There was no error here.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “final instructions would be presumed to correct any misstatements of law made during final argument.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.