Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 435 NW2D 332 - State v. Akers

State v. Akers’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
5
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently July 2024

12 state decisions

5019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rodgers v. United States · James v. Strange · Iowa Civil Liberties Union v. Critelli · Barnes v. Iowa Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle Division · Arnold v. Arnold

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[ijnterest shall be allowed on all money due on judgments and decrees of courts [and] shall accrue from the date of the commencement of the action....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.