KOHLER v. CHAMBERS’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

11 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “McIntosh v. Watkins , 2019 OK 6 441 P.3d 1094 When the Court examines a statute, our primary goal is to determine legislative intent through the”

   7 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. WHITE v. 918 CONSTRUCTION · IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF FORESEE

2. “When the Court examines a statute, our primary goal is to determine legislative intent through the "plain and ordinary meaning" of the statutory language. Because the legislature expresses its purpose by words, the plain meaning of a statute is deemed to express legislative authorial intent in the absence of any ambiguous or conflicting language.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. WHITE v. 918 CONSTRUCTION · PAYCOM PAYROLL v. BOODOOSINGH

3. “In every case involving the custody of, guardianship of or visitation with a child, the court shall consider evidence of domestic abuse, stalking and/or harassing behavior properly brought before it. If the occurrence of domestic abuse, stalking or harassing behavior is established by a preponderance of the evidence, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that it is not in the best interest of the child to have custody, guardianship, or unsupervised visitation granted to the person against whom domestic abuse, stalking or harassing behavior has been established.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Duke v. Duke