Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 435 P3D 872 - Strong v. Williams

Strong v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2021
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In Re Adoption of AFM · Parson v. STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUE · Jackinsky v. Jackinsky · Tolstrup v. Miller · Sowinski v. Walker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Collateral estoppel prohibits relitigation of issues actually decided in earlier proceedings where: (1) the party against whom the preclusion is employed was a party to or in privity with a party to the first action; (2) the issue precluded from relitigation is identical to the issue decided in the first action; (3) the issue was resolved in the first action by a final judgment on the merits; and (4) the determination of the issue was essential to the final judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.