435 So. 2d 375 - Harpham v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 394 So. 2d 979 - Bell v. State · McCray v. State · 414 So. 2d 1171 - Green v. State · Goodwill Industries of South Florida, Inc. v. Northeastern Fire Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania · M. M. v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]ny weapon (including a starter gun) which will, is designed to, or may readily be converted to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive... .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ridley v. State“in section 790.001(6), Florida Statutes (1981):”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ridley v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.