Perry v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2004
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 362 So. 2d 1236 - Voyles v. State · 318 So. 2d 879 - Ragan v. State · State v. Lindsey · 305 So. 2d 354 - Ryals v. State · State v. Burton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Appellant contends that the state failed to prove a specific intent to take money, since the evidence only showed that appellant entered the building and pointed a gun at an employee while his partner assaulted the other employees, and that, no demand having been made for money, those acts could indicate the probability of other offenses such as kidnapping, rape, or murder, rather than robbery. That argument is frivolous.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the specific intent to rob was shown in the present case overwhelmingly by all of the facts and the inferences.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.