Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 435 So. 2d 76 - Ex Parte Flowers

435 So. 2d 76 - Ex Parte Flowers’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
December 2010
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 2010

9 state decisions

401983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 29 Ala. App. 528 - Department of Industrial Relations v. Pesnell · Ex Parte Pesnell · 45 Ala. App. 688 - Holmes v. Cook · 143 Ind. App. 17 - Bootz Manufacturing Co. v. Review Bd. of Employment Security Div. · 36 Ala. App. 33 - Gulf Atlantic Warehouse Co. v. Bennett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"[T]he legislature did not intend that § 25-4-78 (1) should act to disqualify employees given layoff notices from receipt of unemployment benefits where contract negotiations are ongoing. For us to so hold would give employers involved in the negotiations over union contracts the opportunity to use their economic position as a bargaining tool during the period prior to the expiration of the contract."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Also relevant, is the rule in Holmes v. Cook, 45 Ala.App. 688 , 236 So.2d 352 (1970), that the ‘provisions of disqualification from benefits [in the Unemployment Act] should be narrowly construed.’ A further guideline for our consideration of these claims is the procedural rule which provides that the employer has the burden of proving any disqualification under [§ 25-4-78(1) ] of the Unemployment Compensation Act. See United States Steel Corp. v. Glasgow, 40 Ala.App. 424 , 114 So.2d 565 (1958), rev’d on other grounds, sub nom. United States Steel Corp. v. Curry, 269 Ala. 8 , 114 So.2d 582 (1959).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “an agency independent of the labor dispute,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.