Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 435 So. 2d 769 - King v. State

435 So. 2d 769 - King v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
January 1992
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Fletcher v. State · Ex parte State ex rel. Attorney General · Consalvo v. State · 365 So. 2d 322 - Rogers v. State · Palmer v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Before it can be said that the accused has been denied this constitutional right, he must apply to the court for the issuance of an attachment and show to the court that the witness has been served with a subpoena a sufficient length of time before the trial to afford an opportunity to the witness to obey its mandate, that the witness is in the jurisdiction of the court, and that his attendance can be obtained within a reasonable time by compulsory process . . ."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “a positive demonstration of abuse of judicial discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.