Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 435 U.S. 333 - Lakeside v. Oregon

Lakeside v. Oregon’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

705
cited by 705 later decisions
39
cited 39 times by the Supreme Court
37
states following
June 2023
most recently cited

194 federal appellate · 12 district · 350 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 705 later decisions (39 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2023 · most notably Old Chief v. United States (1997), Jenkins v. Anderson (1980)

194 federal appellate · 12 district · 350 state decisions — followed in 37 states

2800197819801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · Griffin v. California · Malloy v. Hogan · Snyder v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · Hoffa v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 705 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]t would be strange indeed to conclude that this cautionary instruction violates the very constitutional provision it is intended to protect.”
    22 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In an adversary system of criminal justice, there is no right more essential than the right to the assistance of counsel.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““It is clear from even a cursory review of the facts and the square holding of the Griffin [v. California] [ 380 U.S. 609 , 85 S.Ct. 1229 , 14 L.Ed.2d 106 ] case that the court was there concerned only with adverse comment, whether by the prosecutor or the trial judge — ‘comment by the prosecution on the accused’s silence or instructions by the court that such silence is evidence of guilt.’ Id. at 615, 85 S.Ct., at 1233 . The court reasoned that such adverse comment amounted to ‘a penalty imposed by courts for exercising a constitutional privilege. It cuts down on the .privilege by making its assertion costly.’ Id., at 614, 85 S.Ct., at 1232 .” Id. at 338-39, 90 S.Ct. at 1094.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.