Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 436 F.2d 1064 - Paramount Transport Systems v. Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers, Local 150

Paramount Transport Systems v. Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers, Local 150’s Empirical Analysis

436 F.2d 1064 · 1971

Citation profile

69
cited by 69 later decisions
5
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 14 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably City of Hackensack v. Winner (1980), Santos v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. KAUAI DIV. (1982)

26 federal appellate · 14 district · 7 state decisions

32019711980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co. · United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]e conclude that collateral estoppel effect should be given only to those administrative determinations that have been made in a proceeding fully complying with the standards of procedural and substantive due process that attend a valid judgment by a court and further, that such effect should be accorded only to those findings upon material issues that are supported by substantial evidence on the administrative record as a whole.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.