Roger A. Mailloux v. Daniel R. Kiley’s Empirical Analysis
436 F.2d 565 · 1971
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 6 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently May 2010 · most notably Roger A. Mailloux v. Daniel P. Kiley (1971), Presidents Council, District 25 v. Community School Board No. 25 (1972)
13 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Earley v. DiCenso · Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. R Laird · Robert J. Keefe v. George J. Geanakos · Charles Close v. John W. Lederle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The court in no way regrets its decision in Keefe v. Geanakos (CCA 1 1969), 418 F.2d 359 , but it did not intend to do away with what, to use an old-fashioned term, are considered the proprieties, or to give carte blanche in the name of academic freedom to conduct which can reasonably be deemed both offensive and unnecessary to the accomplishment of education. Cf. Close v. Lederle (CCA 1 1970), 424 F.2d 988 , cert. den. 400 U.S. 903 , 91 S.Ct. 141 , 27 L.Ed.2d 140 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““ * * * we say that the court does not intend to referee every debatable dispute between school teachers and their employers, simply because academic freedom may arguably be involved. We will not superimpose our judgment on the school authorities, unless, in a constitutional area, we consider their decision plainly wrong.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“... can reasonably be deemed both offensive and unnecessary to the accomplishment of educational objectives... are matters of degree involving judgment on such factors as the age and sophistication of students, relevance of the educational purpose, and context and manner of presentation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.