Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 436 F.3d 551 - Warfield v. Byron

Warfield v. Byron’s Empirical Analysis

436 F.3d 551 · 2006

Citation profile

185
cited by 185 later decisions
6
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

29 federal appellate · 4 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 185 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably Janvey v. Alguire (2011), American International Specialty Lines Insurance v. Rentech Steel, L.L.C. (2010)

29 federal appellate · 4 district · 8 state decisions

960200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Cunningham v. Brown · Seven Elves, Inc. v. Eskenazi · Scholes v. Lehmann · Agricultural Research and Technology Group Inc Hayes v. Palm Seedlings Partners

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 185 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The trustee may avoid any transfer (including any transfer to or for the benefit of an insider under an employment contract) of an interest of the debtor in property, or any obligation (including any obligation to or for the benefit of an insider under an employment contract) incurred by the debtor, that was made or incurred on or within 2 years before the date of the filing of the petition, if the debtor voluntarily or involuntarily— (A) made such transfer or incurred such obligation with actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud any entity to which the debtor was or became, on or after the date that such transfer was made or such obligation was incurred, indebted; or (B)(i) received less than a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for such transfer or obligation; and (ii) (I) was insolvent on the date that such transfer was made or such obligation was incurred, or became insolvent as a result of such transfer or obligation; (II) was engaged in business or a transaction, or was about to engage in business or a transaction, for which any property remaining with the debtor was an unreasonably small capital; (III) intended to incur, or believed that the debtor would incur, debts that would be beyond the debtor’s ability to pay as such debts matured; or (IV) made such transfer to or for the benefit of an insider, or incurred such obligation to or for the benefit of an insid er, under an employment contract and not in the ordinary course of business. 11 U.S.C. § 548 (a)(1).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A transfer made or obligation incurred by a debtor is fraudulent as to a creditor, whether the creditor’s claim arose before or within a reasonable time after the transfer was made or the obligation was incurred, if the debtor made the transfer or incurred the obligation ... with actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud any creditor of the debtor.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he primary consideration in analyzing the exchange for value for any transfer is the degree to which the transferor’s net worth is preserved” because”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.