Dunlap v. Hepp’s Empirical Analysis
436 F.3d 739 · 2006
Citation profile
11 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on United States v. Booker · Blakely v. Washington · Williams v. Taylor · Crawford v. Washington · Delaware v. Van Arsdall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the Wisconsin court recognized that its rape shield law must yield if it would deprive a defendant of his constitutional rights.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sussman v. Jenkins“established law as set out by the U.S. Supreme Court in Chambers or Davis.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sussman v. Jenkins
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.