Haas v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1701 (Affordable Housing for Seniors and Families Act) · 12 U.S.C. § 1715Z · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 42 U.S.C. § 1401 · 5 U.S.C. § 701
Relies on United States v. Munsingwear, Inc. · Landis v. North American Co. · Hansberry v. Lee · Sam Fox Publishing Company v. United States · Central South Carolina Chapter v. Martin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that the Underwood plaintiffs argued two theories before Judge Pratt: 1) that the Secretary was obliged to implement the operating subsidy program and 2) that the Secretary was not permitted to pass along rent increases to tenants without taking into account the operating subsidies that she was required to implement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Haas v. Howard“this failure to exhaust alternative remedial possibilities would bar subsequent litigation on the same issue,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Haas v. Howard“an injunction against assessment of rent increases”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Haas v. Howard
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.