Piche v. Nugent’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 district · 2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “nothing in either Daubert or the Federal Rules of Evidence requires a district court to admit opinion evidence which is connected to existing data only by the ipse dixit of the expert. A court may conclude that there is simply too great an analytical gap between the data and the opinion proffered.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 770 F. Supp. 2d 370 - Maine Human Rights Commission v. Sunbury Primary Care, P.A.

2. “'A plaintiff’s duty to mitigate damages arises after he or she has suffered an injury or loss....’”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. McKinley v. Casson