Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 436 MASS 829 - Commonwealth v. McIntyre

Commonwealth v. McIntyre’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
2
states following
October 2021
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently October 2021 · most notably Commonwealth v. Denehy (2014), Commonwealth v. Henry (2016)

28 state decisions

150200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Harmelin v. Michigan · Hughey v. United States · United States v. Virginia · United States v. Vaknin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[r]estitution is limited to economic losses caused by the defendant's conduct and documented by the victim.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “There is no question that restitution is an appropriate consideration in a criminal sentencing”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “to request that restitution be an element of the final disposition of a case”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.