Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 436 MD 97 - Dionas v. State

Dionas v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
2
states following
May 2024
most recently cited

55 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Estelle v. McGuire · Alford v. United States · Smith v. Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'be satisfied that there is no reasonable possibility that the evidence complained of - whether erroneously admitted or excluded - may have contributed to the rendition of the guilty verdict.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[W]here credibility is an issue and, thus, the jury's assessment of who is telling the truth is critical, an error affecting the jury's ability to assess a witness's credibility is not harmless error.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “'whether the trial court's error was unimportant in relation to everything else the jury considered in reaching its verdict.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.