Castro v. Castro’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 2001
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Rooker v. Bruce · Stitle v. Stitle · Whitman v. Whitman · 179 Ind. App. 368 - Jahn v. Jahn · 113 Ind. App. 589 - Starkie v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Of course, a receipt signed by the mother is much less open to dispute than a father’s simple verbal assertion that he paid. But these are questions of weight and credibility, not of the propriety of the proof. Accordingly, they may and should properly be resolved by the trier of fact.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Payson v. Payson“[mloney actually paid and received in discharge of a judicially declared obligation of support is just that.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. O'Neil v. O'Neil
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.