State v. Olson’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2018 · most notably Minnesota v. Olson (1990), State v. Guevara (1998)
1 federal appellate · 25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Wong Sun v. United States · Rakas v. Illinois · Jones v. United States · Ker v. State of California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`a warrantless intrusion may be justified by hot pursuit of a fleeing felon, or imminent destruction of evidence [citation], or the need to prevent a suspect's escape, or the risk of danger to the police or to other persons inside or outside the dwelling'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Guevara · People v. Givens“(a) whether a grave or violent offense is involved; (b) whether the suspect is reasonably believed to be armed; (c) whether there is strong probable cause connecting the suspect to the offense; (d) whether police have strong reason to believe the suspect is on the premises; (e) whether it is likely the suspect 'will escape if not swiftly apprehended; and (f) whether peaceable entry was made.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Hummel“The police knew that Louanne and Julie were with the suspect in the upstairs duplex with no suggestion of danger to them. Three or four Minneapolis police squads surrounded the house. The time was 3 p.m., Sunday. . . . It was evident the suspect was going nowhere. If he came out of the house he would have been promptly apprehended.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Minnesota v. Olson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.