Gargan v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently October 1990
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Spies v. United States · Libby, McNeill & Libby v. Alaska Industrial Board · United States v. Coplon · Shay v. United States · Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Sun Oil Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In regard to experiments and court room demonstrations, Professor McCormick states that: The general requirement of similarity of conditions applied to experimental evidence generally applies with equal force to experiments in court. Manifestly, the trial judge can best determine whether the confusion and delay incident to the court-room experiment outweigh its value, and his wide discretionary power to permit or exclude the experiment is constantly emphasized.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Love v. State · Smith v. State“A person who attempts to commit a crime, and in the attempt does any act toward the commission of the crime, but fails, or is prevented or intercepted in the perpetration of the crime, when no other provision is made by law for the punishment of the attempt, upon conviction, is punishable as follows. (1) . . . If the period prescribed as a punishment for the crime is an indeterminate or life term, the punishment for the attempt shall be fixed by the court at a term not more than 10 years.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Braham v. State“only those facts in the record most favorable to the state and such reasonable inferences as the jury may have drawn from them. * * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Fuller v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.