Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 436 PA 532 - Commonwealth v. Commander

Commonwealth v. Commander’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

123
cited by 123 later decisions
2
states following
March 2002
most recently cited

123 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 123 later decisions — most recently March 2002 · most notably Commonwealth v. Paquette (1973), Commonwealth v. O'SEARO (1976)

123 state decisions

9901970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Davis v. United States · Commonwealth v. Kravitz · Commonwealth v. Tabb · Commonwealth v. Drum · Commonwealth v. Lowry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 123 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Malice is a legal term, implying much more. It comprehends not only a particular ill-will, but every case where there is wickedness of disposition, hardness of heart, cruelty, recklessness of consequences, and a mind regardless of social duty, although a particular person may not be intended to be injured. Murder, therefore, at common law embraces cases where no intent to kill existed, but where the state or frame of mind termed malice, in its legal sense, prevailed.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he test of the sufficiency of the evidence — irrespective of whether it is direct or circumstantial, or both — is whether, accepting as true all the evidence and all reasonable inferences therefrom, upon which if believed the jury could properly have based its verdict, it is sufficient in law to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty of the crime or crimes of which he has been convicted.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.