Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 436 PA 555 - Commonwealth v. Stots

Commonwealth v. Stots’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
November 2011
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hawkins v. United States · Rivera v. United States · Commonwealth v. Williams · Commonwealth v. Scoleri · Manfredi Estate

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[C]onnivance by the parties cannot evade it, nor can indulgence by the court.” Commonwealth v. Stots, 436 Pa. 555 , 261 A.2d 577 (1970); Canole v. Allen, 222 Pa. 156, 159 , 70 A. 1053 . Accord, Huffman v. Simmons, 131 Pa.Super. 370, 376 , 200 A. 274, 276 (1938).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.