Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 436 Pa. Super. 40 - Pascal v. Carter

436 Pa. Super. 40 - Pascal v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
November 2010
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently November 2010

3 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

110199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cuthbert v. Philadelphia · 270 Pa. Super. 428 - McCullough v. Monroeville Home Ass'n, Post 820, Inc. · Dornon v. Johnston · Koelle v. Philadelphia Electric Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If there is some evidence of contributory negligence, the issue should be submitted to the jury. McCollough [McCullough] v. Monroeville Home Ass’n, Etc., 270 Pa.Super. 428 , 411 A.2d 794, 795 (1979). However, the burden of establishing contributory negligence rests on the defendant. Id. at 431 , 411 A.2d at 795 . Additionally, for a plaintiff’s negligent conduct to effect his recovery, his conduct must be a proximate cause of his injury. Koelle v. Philadelphia Electric Co., 443 Pa. 35, 42 , 277 A.2d 350, 354 (1971). In order for negligent conduct to be a proximate cause of an injury it must be a substantial factual cause of the injury for which damages are sought. Dornon v. Johnston, 421 Pa. 58, 60 , 218 A.2d 808, 809 (1966).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.