436 Pa. Super. 486 - Frampton v. Dauphin Distribution Services Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Marks v. Tasman · Stark v. Lehigh Foundries, Inc. · Marshall v. Port Authority · 424 Pa. Super. 449 - E.J.M. v. Archdiocese of Philadelphia · 430 Pa. Super. 10 - Reilly v. Tiergarten Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Pennsylvania courts ... have refused to impose a duty on an architect to protect workers from hazards on a construction site in the absence of an undertaking by the architect, either by contract or course of conduct, to supervise and/or control the construction and to maintain safe conditions on the construction site.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.