Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 436 SO2D 1047 - Irby v. State

Irby v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 1985
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. Phillips · Commonwealth v. Colon · Morgan v. State · 399 So. 2d 1088 - Hawthorne v. State · 136 Tex. Crim. 226 - Lugo v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the limited circumstances which the case now before us presents, i.e., correlation of an unusual specific employment risk for the juror and the victim of the offense charged.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “denial of appellant's challenge was an abuse of discretion resulting in manifest error which requires reversal of appellant's conviction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “In all criminal prosecutions the accused shall ... have a speedy and public trial by impartial jury....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.