436 So. 2d 21 - Tidmore v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
January 1999
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Burgett v. Texas · 48 Ala. App. 144 - Poellnitz v. State · 405 So. 2d 71 - James v. State · Williams v. State · 406 So. 2d 1051 - Douglas v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"`"[A]lthough we would deem it better practice for the trial judge to formally adjudge the defendant guilty before rendering sentence, our courts have consistently held that an implied judgment of guilty results where there appears a valid sentence in proper form by the court in compliance with a verdict of guilt."'"”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Hurth v. State · Morgan v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.