436 So. 2d 23 - Norvene v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 1991
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Swansboro Country, Inc. v. Lumberman's Mortgage Co. · Union Labor Life Insurance v. Pireno · 409 So. 2d 466 - Gullatt v. State · 401 So. 2d 167 - Bozeman v. State · Tillman v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"On a motion to exclude state's evidence this Court is required to view state's evidence most favorable to the state, and not substitute its judgment for that of the jury. Where the evidence presented by the state raises questions of fact for the jury, and if believed by the jury, and is sufficient to sustain a verdict of guilty, this Court should not disturb the jury verdict." (Citations omitted.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“sufficient to sustain a guilty verdict finding the [accused] guilty as charged”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.