Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 436 So. 2d 620 - State v. Frith

436 So. 2d 620 - State v. Frith’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 1997
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Guidry · 436 So. 2d 623 - State v. Frith · 412 So. 2d 1000 - State v. Frith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Upon the expiration of the limitations established by this Chapter, the court shall, upon motion of the defendant, dismiss the indictment. This right of dismissal is waived unless the motion to quash is made prior to trial. If the indictment is dismissed under this article, there shall be no further prosecution against the defendant for the same or a lesser offense based on the same facts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “, the State averred that the offense was committed between October, 1979, and May, 1980. After trial commenced, the State moved to amend the indictment,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “... to read the dates of October to May—October of 1979 to May of 1980”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.