436 So. 2d 623 - State v. Frith’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently May 2018
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mansion House Center South Redevelopment Co. v. United States · Gillette Co. v. Miner · 376 So. 2d 1240 - State v. Gainey · 337 So. 2d 192 - State v. McCoy · 409 So. 2d 535 - State v. Naas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The purpose of a bill of particulars is to provide an accused with sufficient information as to the nature and cause of the offense with which he is charged.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Fussell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.