Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 436 S.W.2d 334 - Ladehoff v. Ladehoff

Ladehoff v. Ladehoff’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
April 2010
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently April 2010 · most notably Frost National Bank v. Fernandez (2010), Reimer v. Smith (1981)

5 federal appellate · 21 state decisions

100196819701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pure Oil Co. v. Reece · Pure Oil Co. v. Reece · Schneider v. Sellers · Houston v. Cole · McCamant v. Roberts

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An in rem judgment ... is binding upon the whole world and specifically upon persons who have rights or interest in the subject matter, and this is so whether those persons were or were not personally served.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Glover v. Landes · In Re: Vickie Lynn Marshall, Debtor. E. Pierce Marshall, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant/appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Vickie Lynn Marshall, Defendant-Counter-Claimant/appellee-Cross-Appellant
  2. “Any person interested may, by a bill of review filed in the court in which the probate proceedings were had, have any decision, order, or judgment rendered by the court, or by the judge thereof, revised and corrected on showing error therein ...”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re Estate of Davidson · In Re Estate of Hutchins
  3. “[a]n attack upon a probate judgment under Section 93 [of the Probate Code] is a method for making a direct attack which is in addition to the forms for direct attacks authorized by Sections 28 and 30, which are appellate in nature.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Estate of Devitt · Willis v. Scottish Rite Hospital for Crippled Children

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.