Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

436 S.W.2d 341

Hollis v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 29, 1969

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1969-01-29

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1973

1 state decisions

Relies on Hill v. State · Kerby v. State · Dewitt v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1969-01-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1OPINION

BELCHER, Judge.

¶2The conviction is for robbery by assault; the punishment was assessed at ten years which was probated.

¶3The appellant did not comply with Section 9 of Article 40.09, Vernon’s Ann.C.C. P., in that he did not file a brief in the trial court “(w)ithin thirty days after approval of the record by the court” or during any additional period which the court authorized setting forth the grounds of error of which he desires to complain on appeal. Hill v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 403 S.W.2d 797; Yarbrough v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 408 S.W.2d 230; Melick v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 409 *342S.W.2d 412; Dewitt v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 409 S.W.2d 852; Ochoa v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 424 S.W.2d 642.

¶4There is no showing of indigency.

¶5Nothing appears in the record which should be considered as unassigned error under Section 13 of Article 40.09, supra.

¶6The judgment is affirmed.

DOUGLAS, J., not participating.
/436/sw2d/341 · .json · Public domain