Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 436 SW3D 28 - Jesse Thomas Sutherland v. State

Jesse Thomas Sutherland v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
July 2016
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 427th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Schmerber v. State of California · Ker v. State of California · United States v. Robinson · Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn. · Ohio v. Robinette

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The dissent .implies that we have given carte blanche to officers to draw blood in every single' DWI case. But we have given police .officers nothing more than the Constitution already gives them — the ability to apply for' a search warrant and,' if the magistrate finds probable cause to issue that warrant, the ability to effectuate it. This does not give officers the ability to forcibly obtain blood'samples from anyone arrested for DWI. Instead, it gives officers the ability to present an affidavit to a magistrate in every DWI case, just like every other criminal offense. Whether any search ultimately occurs rests, as always, in the hands of the neutral and detached magistrate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.