Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 437 A2D 153 - Stewart v. State

Stewart v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 2011
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently June 2011

6 state decisions

301981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Whalen v. State · Holden v. State · Weick v. State · Kreisher v. State · Hand v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person is guilty of conspiracy in the second degree when, intending to promote or facilitate the commission of a felony, the person: (1) Agrees with another person or persons that they or 1 or more of them will engage in conduct constituting the felony or an attempt or solicitation to commit the felony; or (2) Agrees to aid another person or persons in the planning or commission of the felony or an attempt or solicitation to commit the felony; and the person or another person with whom the person conspired commits an overt act in pursuance of the conspiracy, (emphasis added).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““CONSPIRACY SECOND DEGREE in violation of Title 11, § 512 of the Delaware Code of 1974, as amended. “DANA M. OWENS aka DANA M. LLOYD, on or about the 25th day of August, 1980, in the County of New Castle, State of Delaware, when intending to promote the commission of a felony, did agree with Judy Dollard that they would engage in conduct constituting the felony of Robbery Fjrst Degree and did commit an overt act in furtherance of said conspiracy, to wit: Robbery First Degree, as set forth in Count I of the Indictment and incorporated herein by reference.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““§ 271. Liability for the conduct of another— Generally. “A person is guilty of an offense committed by another person when: “(2) Intending to promote or facilitate the commission of the offense he: “b. Aids, counsels or agrees or attempts to aid the other person in planning or committing it;””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.