Boxer X v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
437 F.3d 1107 · 2006
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 157 later decisions — most recently February 2024 · most notably Smith v. Mosley (2008), Douglas v. Yates (2008)
12 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Farmer v. Brennan · Harris v. Garner · Oliver v. Keller · Boddie v. Schnieder · Hughes v. Lott
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 157 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Pro se pleadings are held to a less stringent standard than pleadings drafted by attorneys and will, therefore, be liberally construed.” Boxer X v. Harris, 437 F.3d 1107, 1110 (11th Cir.2006) (quotations omitted). 3 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“join[s] other circuits recognizing that severe or repetitive sexual abuse of a prisoner by a prison official can violate the Eighth Amendment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Boxer X v. Harris
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.