United States v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
437 F.3d 69 · 2006
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 10 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently January 2021 · most notably United States v. Baugham (2006), United States v. Johnson (2008)
21 federal appellate · 10 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 856 (§ 416 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on United States v. Olano · Illinois v. Gates · United States v. Leon · Ornelas v. United States · Johnson v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in the affiant’s experience, drug dealers frequently keep business records, narcotics, proceeds from sales, and firearms in their houses”). . In the instant case, Pugh’s Affidavit does state that, based on his training and experience, gun possessors”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.