Glen Bootay v. KBR Inc’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1929
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · In re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation · Max's Seafood Cafe Lou-Ann Inc v. Quinteros · Harsco Corp. v. Zlotnicki · Guy v. Liederbach
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The parties [Bootay and KBR] do not dispute that Pennsylvania law applies to this case. Consequently, we shall apply Pennsylvania law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.