Pavlo v. James’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 1996
2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Relies on Shaffer v. Heitner · Lehigh Valley Industries, Inc. v. Birenbaum · Venner v. Michigan Central Railroad · Netograph Manufacturing Co. v. . Scrugham · American Eutectic Weeding Alloys Sales Co. v. Dytron Alloys Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“commits a tortious act without the state causing injury to person or property within the state ... if he ... expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.