437 F. Supp. 2d 696 - Liedtke v. Frank’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1681 · 15 U.S.C. § 1681B · 15 U.S.C. § 1681N
Relies on Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · Thomson-Csf Sa v. American Arbitration Association · MS Dealer Service Corp. v. Franklin · United States v. Alpert · Charles Grigson River City Films Inc
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[E]quitable estoppel applies when the signatory to a written agreement containing an arbitration clause “must rely on the terms of the written agreement in asserting [its] claims” against the non-signatory. When each of a signatory’s claims against a nonsignatory “makes reference to” or “presumes the existence of’ the written agreement, the signatory’s claims “arise[] out of and relate[] directly to the [written] agreement, and arbitration is appropriate.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.